Learn annual giving best practices for higher ed teams that want better alumni engagement, stronger retention, and cleaner outreach.

Jesse Wisnewski
CEO & Founder
Published
Read Time
6 min read

Annual giving is often treated like a revenue line.
It is more than that.
For colleges and universities, annual giving is one of the clearest signals of alumni engagement. It shows whether graduates, parents, friends, faculty, staff, and other supporters still feel connected to the institution.
That connection does not happen by accident.
It depends on steady outreach, strong stewardship, relevant messages, clean data, and a clear reason to participate.
Most advancement teams understand this. The challenge is capacity.
Your team has more alumni to reach than hours in the week. You have campaigns to build, records to clean, events to promote, donors to thank, and lapsed supporters to re-engage.
That is why annual giving needs a practical system.
In this post, we'll dig into:
What Is Annual Giving?
Why Annual Giving Is Harder Than It Looks
Start With the Relationship, Not the Appeal
Segment Alumni by Context
Clean Your Contact Data Before Campaigns
Build Around Clear Campaign Moments
Use More Than One Channel
Thank Donors Quickly
Follow Up With Lapsed Donors
Measure Engagement, Not Only Revenue
Before getting started, here's the TL;DR.
TL;DR
The best annual giving programs are built around consistent engagement, not one-time appeals.
Higher education advancement teams can strengthen annual giving by segmenting audiences, cleaning contact data, personalizing outreach, creating clear campaign moments, using multiple channels, thanking donors quickly, re-engaging lapsed donors, and measuring more than revenue.
EverRaise helps advancement teams support this work through AI voice, SMS, email, surveys, campaign workflows, data validation, and automated follow-up.
The best annual giving programs are built around consistent engagement, not one-time appeals.
Higher education advancement teams can strengthen annual giving by segmenting audiences, cleaning contact data, personalizing outreach, creating clear campaign moments, using multiple channels, thanking donors quickly, re-engaging lapsed donors, and measuring more than revenue.
EverRaise helps advancement teams support this work through AI voice, SMS, email, surveys, campaign workflows, data validation, and automated follow-up.
What Is Annual Giving?
Annual giving is the ongoing fundraising program that invites supporters to contribute each year.
In higher education, annual giving often supports:
Scholarships
Student experiences
Academic programs
Athletics
Individual departments
Emergency funds
Research
Campus priorities
Unrestricted institutional needs
Annual gifts are usually smaller than major gifts, but collectively they play a large role in long-term advancement health.
They can help your team:
Keep alumni connected
Build a habit of giving
Identify future major-gift prospects
Support scholarships and student needs
Increase donor participation
Strengthen donor retention
Create a pipeline for deeper engagement
The CASE Insights on Voluntary Support of Education provides higher education institutions with broader context and benchmarking around philanthropic support.
But annual giving is not only about the size of a gift.
It is also about whether supporters are still raising their hands and choosing to participate.
That distinction matters. Research highlighted by the GivingTuesday Data Commons found that recent growth across the nonprofit sector has been driven heavily by major and supersized donors, increasing dependence on fewer, larger gifts.
A healthy annual giving program can help institutions maintain a broader base of engaged supporters alongside major and principal giving.
Why Annual Giving Is Harder Than It Looks
Annual giving sounds simple:
Ask people to give each year.
But the work behind it is complex.
Advancement teams often need to reach many audiences at once:
Recent graduates
Young alumni
Long-time alumni
Parents
Faculty and staff
Athletics supporters
Department donors
Scholarship donors
Event attendees
Lapsed donors
Volunteers
Each group may need a different message, channel, timing, and next step.
At the same time, donor records may be incomplete. Phone numbers change. Email addresses go stale. Alumni move. Communication preferences shift. Notes may live in different systems.
When data is messy, outreach gets harder.
When outreach gets harder, annual giving becomes less consistent.
And when communication becomes inconsistent, it becomes more difficult to build the habits and relationships that lead to repeat participation.
The Fundraising Effectiveness Project tracks donor acquisition, retention, participation, and fundraising performance across the nonprofit sector. Its work reinforces the importance of looking beyond total dollars raised to understand whether supporters are continuing to give.
1. Start With the Relationship, Not the Appeal
The strongest annual giving programs do not only ask.
They keep supporters connected before, during, and after the appeal.
That means your team should think about annual giving as a relationship cycle:
Share useful updates
Invite participation
Ask clearly
Thank quickly
Show impact
Ask for feedback
Invite the next step
If alumni only hear from your institution when you need a gift, the relationship can feel thin and transactional.
Annual giving works better when fundraising feels like part of an ongoing connection to the people, programs, experiences, and values that alumni care about.
That connection may include:
Student stories
Faculty updates
Alumni achievements
Campus news
Volunteer opportunities
Regional events
Career resources
Surveys and feedback
Invitations to mentor students
Stories showing the impact of donor support
Not every communication needs to contain an appeal.
The relationship should have value even when you are not asking for money.
2. Segment Alumni by Context
Segmentation helps your team avoid generic outreach.
Start with practical segments that meaningfully change the message, offer, timing, or next step.
Examples include:
First-time donors
Repeat donors
Consecutive-year donors
Lapsed donors
Recent graduates
Class-year groups
Athletics supporters
Scholarship donors
Event attendees
Volunteers
Parents
Regional alumni
Alumni connected to specific departments or programs
Segmentation does not need to be complicated.
The goal is relevance.
A recent graduate may need a low-friction invitation to participate for the first time. A long-time donor may need a stewardship update demonstrating the impact of continued support. A lapsed donor may need a warm reactivation message. An event attendee may need follow-up tied to a recent campus experience.
Segmentation can also help your team decide which channel to use.
Someone who regularly opens email may not need the same outreach cadence as someone who has stopped responding but still has a valid mobile number. A committed athletics supporter may respond better to a message from a coach, former athlete, or fellow fan than to a general institutional appeal.
Good segmentation makes communication feel more personal without requiring your team to write a completely different campaign for every individual.
3. Clean Your Contact Data Before Campaigns
Annual giving depends on reach.
If your contact data is outdated, even a thoughtful campaign can underperform.
Before a major annual giving push, review:
Email deliverability
Phone-number accuracy
Mailing addresses
Alumni and constituent status
Giving history
Event participation
Communication preferences
Consent and opt-out records
Duplicate records
Missing or inconsistent fields
Cleaner contact data gives your team a better chance of reaching the right people with the right message.
It also saves staff time.
Your team should not have to discover bad data in the middle of a campaign. Every dead phone number, outdated email address, duplicate record, and incorrect status creates unnecessary work and makes campaign performance harder to evaluate.
A low response rate may reflect weak messaging.
It may also reflect a list filled with people you could not reach.
EverRaise’s Data Validation helps advancement teams identify outdated emails, bad phone numbers, and other list problems before voice, SMS, or email campaigns go live.
Clean the list first. Then evaluate the campaign.
4. Build Around Clear Campaign Moments
Annual giving needs rhythm.
Clear campaign moments help supporters understand why their participation matters now.
Examples include:
Giving days
Reunion giving
Scholarship campaigns
Athletics campaigns
Department campaigns
Fiscal year-end appeals
Calendar year-end appeals
Founder’s Day campaigns
Class challenges
Parent giving campaigns
Emergency or student-support campaigns
Each moment should have a simple message.
What are you asking people to do?
Why does it matter now?
Who will benefit?
What will participation help make possible?
What should the supporter do next?
The more specific the answers, the easier it is for supporters to engage.
A generic message such as “Support the annual fund” may be technically accurate, but it leaves much of the meaning for the donor to determine.
A more specific message connects participation to a visible outcome:
Help fund emergency assistance for students.
Provide scholarships for first-generation students.
Support travel and equipment for student-athletes.
Help a department create hands-on learning opportunities.
Honor your class reunion by supporting today’s students.
The GivingTuesday Data Commons studies generosity beyond financial transactions alone, including volunteering, participation, and other expressions of support. That broader view is useful for campus giving days, which can create opportunities for donations, volunteer engagement, peer outreach, storytelling, and updated contact information.
A campaign moment can do more than raise money.
It can give supporters a reason to reconnect.
5. Use More Than One Channel
Not every alum will respond to email.
Some will notice a text. Some will answer a call. Some will click after seeing a social post. Others will respond because a classmate, coach, faculty member, student, or volunteer reached out personally.
A strong annual giving plan may include:
Email
SMS
AI voice calls
Direct mail
Social media
Peer outreach
Event follow-up
Volunteer ambassador messages
Personal outreach from advancement staff
Student thank-you calls or videos
The M+R Benchmarks Study evaluates nonprofit engagement across email, mobile messaging, social media, advertising, websites, direct mail, and fundraising. Its channel-by-channel approach reflects an important reality: no single communication method reaches every supporter equally well.
The goal is not to contact people everywhere, all the time.
The goal is to coordinate outreach respectfully across the channels where supporters are most likely to engage.
A multichannel campaign might look like this:
Send an email introducing the campaign and its impact.
Follow up with a text containing a clear action or reminder.
Call selected segments that may benefit from a conversation.
Send a second email featuring a student or donor story.
Follow up with people who clicked, replied, requested information, or expressed interest.
Thank donors through the channel they are most likely to see.
EverRaise’s Campaign Builder helps advancement teams coordinate AI voice, SMS, email, surveys, and follow-up from a shared campaign workflow.
For calls, texts, and email, make sure your team has appropriate consent, disclosures, opt-out processes, internal review, and compliance practices in place.
6. Thank Donors Quickly
Thank-you messages are not administrative cleanup.
They are part of the donor experience.
After someone gives, your team should quickly answer three questions:
Did we receive the gift?
Does the gift matter?
What happens next?
A prompt thank-you can be simple.
It may include:
A personal email
A handwritten note
A short phone call
An SMS acknowledgment
A student video
A message from a dean, coach, or faculty member
An impact update
A receipt followed by a more personal acknowledgment
The Association of Donor Relations Professionals recognizes donor relations and stewardship as distinct professional disciplines serving education, healthcare, and other nonprofit institutions.
That distinction is important.
Stewardship is not merely the receipt sent after a transaction. It is the work of acknowledging support, communicating impact, building trust, and maintaining the relationship after the gift.
The best stewardship does not wait until the next appeal.
It helps donors understand that their participation was noticed and meaningful.
7. Follow Up With Lapsed Donors
Lapsed donors are not always lost donors.
Some stopped giving because life got busy. Some missed an appeal. Some changed email addresses. Some did not connect with the message. Others never received a clear follow-up after their previous gift.
A lapsed-donor campaign should feel respectful and specific.
It can:
Recognize the donor’s previous support
Remind them of the impact they helped create
Explain what has changed since they last gave
Invite them back into the institution’s story
Offer more than one way to participate
Ask whether their contact information or preferences have changed
Provide a clear, low-friction next step
Do not treat every lapsed donor the same.
Someone who gave once ten years ago needs a different message than someone who gave every year and only missed the most recent year.
Consider segmenting lapsed donors by:
Date of last gift
Number of previous gifts
Consecutive years of giving
Prior designation
Average gift amount
Event participation
Volunteer activity
Engagement with recent communications
Previous relationship with a department, team, or program
The Fundraising Effectiveness Project helps organizations examine retention and recapture alongside acquisition and revenue. That broader view can help advancement teams distinguish between one-time campaign performance and the long-term health of the donor base.
8. Measure Engagement, Not Only Revenue
Revenue matters.
But annual giving health is broader than dollars raised.
Track signals such as:
Donor retention
Reactivated donors
First-time donors
Repeat donors
Consecutive-year donors
Participation by class year
Participation by audience segment
Email replies
SMS responses
Survey responses
Event registrations
Volunteer interest
Updated contact records
Meetings or conversations generated
Referrals to major-gift or alumni-relations teams
The CASE Alumni Engagement Metrics framework encourages institutions to consider alumni engagement through multiple modes, including philanthropy, volunteerism, experiential engagement, and communications.
That broader measurement matters because alumni relationships do not always move in a straight line.
An alum may attend an event before making a gift. A donor may complete a survey before becoming a volunteer. A volunteer may eventually become a recurring donor or major-gift prospect.
Annual giving should create opportunities for these relationships to develop.
Your reporting should help answer:
Are more people participating?
Are first-time donors returning?
Are lapsed donors re-engaging?
Which messages generate replies?
Which channels reach specific segments?
Are contact records improving?
Are supporters taking additional steps?
Are relationships becoming stronger?
Revenue tells you what happened financially.
Engagement signals can help explain why.
Final Takeaway
Annual giving is not only a fundraising calendar.
It is a relationship system.
When your team keeps alumni engaged, follows up consistently, communicates impact, and starts campaigns with cleaner data, annual giving becomes stronger.
The work is practical:
Reach the right people.
Say something relevant.
Ask clearly.
Thank them well.
Keep the relationship moving.
Continue Reading
You might also like
View all posts

Learn practical alumni engagement strategies advancement offices can use to increase participation, improve outreach, deepen affinity, and support annual giving.

A capital campaign is a focused fundraising effort for a major nonprofit priority. Learn the key phases, best practices, and how better donor engagement supports campaign success.